27 December 2018

UK needs to choose its Brexit future: dog-into-wolf OR dog-into-dingo

By George ILIEV
CorporateNature Metaphor Series, No 69.

Brexit will need to unwind 45 years of economic and legal convergence between Britain and the EU. This is similar to unwinding the genetic evolution of the domesticated dog and turning it back into a wild wolf...or at least into a dingo (a feral dog). Britain's choice of divergence strategies (dog-into-wolf OR dog-into-dingo) is actually not much of a choice. Sadly both come with the stigma of being an outsider to the civilised human world.

The full text of this #BrexitMetaphors blog post can be found here: 

http://brexitmetaphors.blogspot.com/2018/12/dog-wolf-or-dingo.html


Dingo (Source: Wikipedia)

9 March 2018

Swimming vs Splashing: in Water and in Management


A swimmer who makes big splashes in the water is not a good swimmer.

An executive who boasts about their management style is not a competent executive.

The birds that splash the most are pigeons and sparrows. They can't swim at all.

Executives who boast and swagger should brush up on the Dunning Kruger hypothesis. This will help them improve.

Yet, pigeons will never learn to swim.



@GeorgeILIEV  @CorporateNature


8 March 2018

Ideas Are Photons of Light


In solar cells a photon of light dislodges an electron, which starts a chain reaction. This is electricity.

In business an idea comes to the entrepreneur and knocks them out of their sedentary state. This is the beginning of a startup journey.

The photon-electron collision is followed by many more knocks and particle interactions. That's the essence of electricity.

The original idea evolves into many more iterations, pivots and new ideas. That's the essence of the startup journey.

Electricity flows in any direction where it can find a conductor.

The first idea gives impetus but the direction is set by the obstacles along the way.

Electricity may flow afar but in the beginning there was light.

The startup journey may be winding and convoluted but in the beginning there was "a photon of an idea".

@GeorgeILIEV @CorporateNature


26 February 2018

Newborn animals and newly-hired employees share a one-sided world view

Newborn animals imprint on the parent that raises them. New employees imprint on the boss who hires them.
By George ILIEV

The photo of the ducklings could have featured a bucket instead of the mother duck if a moving bucket had been around for the first 16 hours after the ducklings had hatched. Newly-hatched birds are known to imprint on all kinds of moving objects around them: rubber boots, hang-gliders, sets of plastic balls and even humans.


Similarly, newly-hired company employees will imprint on the boss who hires them or supervises them directly in their first days at the company. They will acquire skills and behaviours from their manager that will turn them into a miniature copy of that person. As a result, they will be more understanding, more forgiving and less critical of their boss, compared with veteran employees who have a new boss put in place (helicoptered in). How could one be too critical if this means being critical of themselves?

What's good for the gander must be good enough for the goose.

2 January 2018

Humans: be kind to animals so that robots will be kind to us one day!

Improving humanity’s survival chances in a future world run by robots is a two-step process. 
Step 1: Be kind to animals. 
Step 2: Let robots learn from us, hopefully replicating our kindness to animals in their behaviour to humans.

By George ILIEV

We should treat animals kindly in the hope that robots will treat us kindly once they take over. History does not necessarily repeat itself but it rhymes, to paraphrase Mark Twain. Or you may recall the story of Roman general Scipio Aemilianus who wept when he destroyed Carthage in 146 BC, as he foresaw that the same fate would strike Rome one day. If we treat animals as enemies, we shouldn’t be surprised if we get similar treatment in the future.

1. Pattern recognition: monkey see, monkey do

We are already observing AI (artificial intelligence) developing racist and misogynistic tendencies based on analysis of people-to-people communication and human culture. It is likely that the robots of the future will take their cues from our behaviour, as humans will provide most of the data on which robots will train their AI.

Historically the treatment of animals by humans has run along a gamut of mostly negative experiences: hunting; raising animals for slaughter; domestication to use as beasts of burden; and experiments on animals. Yet, recent history also shows signs of hope: the modern trends of taking care of pets with kindness and respect; or giving up animal-derived food and becoming vegetarian/vegan.

Our treatment of animals is a trend-setting pattern that robots will likely draw upon or even benchmark against when they fine-tune their policies and behaviour towards us.

2. Conformism is the old normal (Watch Zootopia!)

Our peaceful coexistence with robots rests on the assumption that robots will copy us when we are on our best behaviour. They may or may not do so (for better or worse) but either way we should strive to provide positive models to copy rather than ones that may harm humanity.

We can see in the evolution of animal culture and social learning (learning from others) that animals are conformist creatures. Experiments on various species of monkeys and apes demonstrate this clearly:

“Animals strive to act like others, especially others whom they trust and feel close to. Conformist biases shape society by promoting the absorption of habits and knowledge accumulated by previous generations.” 
(Frans de Waal, Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are?, P. 256-259)

If all creatures with a degree of consciousness are kind to one another, then robots will not find alternative models to observe and copy and will conform to our culture. In other words, we should be building a world modelled on peaceful coexistence with animals as in Zootopia (Zootropolis, the movie) before the robots have developed sufficiently to redesign the world on their own. If we build "Zootopia", all we would then need to do is ensure that robots have enough time to evolve around us and with us, so as to learn from our behaviour.



3. Predator vs Alien

The assumption that robots will copy our best selves may be invalidated if robots decided to copy patterns from human history (e.g. slavery) or existing predator-prey behaviour among animals. However, predators hunt their prey to survive, while the robots of the future are unlikely to need to eat flesh to charge up their batteries. This key metaphorical distinction is unlikely to be lost on machines that have evolved intelligence and consciousness.

The key question in the behavioural conformism hypothesis then is whether robots would feel as similar to us as we feel similar to other animals, or as alien to us as we feel alien to other animals. Humanity seems to be treading a fine line between the two at present. Would robots resist the metaphorical model of “predator” or "master", including holding back from playing with humans as an object of entertainment (e.g. as in fox hunting, or in the circus)? Or would they, while being aliens to us, evolve into benevolent aliens that take the best from humanity and disregard historical mistakes in our treatment of other human beings and other animals?

4. 100 Years of Biological Solitude

We will find out in the next 100 years or so which way the robotic cookie crumbles. Our solitude of living only with other biological species will be over when robots become able to reproduce. But if we are still cruel to animals when the first sentient robots come into being, we may run out of time to convince the next generations of robots that we ourselves are worth preserving.